Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0245296, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1024417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment of severely ill COVID-19 patients requires simultaneous management of oxygenation and inflammation without compromising viral clearance. While multiple tools are available to aid oxygenation, data supporting immune biomarkers for monitoring the host-pathogen interaction across disease stages and for titrating immunomodulatory therapy is lacking. METHODS: In this single-center cohort study, we used an immunoassay platform that enables rapid and quantitative measurement of interferon γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10), a host protein involved in lung injury from virus-induced hyperinflammation. A dynamic clinical decision support protocol was followed to manage patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and examine the potential utility of timely and serial measurements of IP-10 as tool in regulating inflammation. RESULTS: Overall, 502 IP-10 measurements were performed on 52 patients between 7 April and 10 May 2020, with 12 patients admitted to the intensive care unit. IP-10 levels correlated with COVID-19 severity scores and admission to the intensive care unit. Among patients in the intensive care unit, the number of days with IP-10 levels exceeding 1,000 pg/mL was associated with mortality. Administration of corticosteroid immunomodulatory therapy decreased IP-10 levels significantly. Only two patients presented with subsequent IP-10 flare-ups exceeding 1,000 pg/mL and died of COVID-19-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Serial and readily available IP-10 measurements potentially represent an actionable aid in managing inflammation in COVID-19 patients and therapeutic decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04389645, retrospectively registered on May 15, 2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , Chemokine CXCL10/blood , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 39: 143-145, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1023410

ABSTRACT

Facing the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, evidence to inform decision-making at all care levels is essential. Based on the results of a study by Petrilli et al., we have developed a calculator using patient data at admission to predict critical illness (intensive care, mechanical ventilation, hospice care, or death). We report a retrospective validation of the calculator on 145 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 to a single hospital in Israel. Despite considerable differences between the original and validation study populations, of 18 patients with critical illness, 17 were correctly identified (sensitivity: 94.4%, 95% CI, 72.7%-99.9%; specificity: 81.9%, 95% CI, 74.1%-88.2%). Of 127 patients with non-critical illness, 104 were correctly identified. Our results indicate that published knowledge can be reliably applied to assess patient risk, potentially reducing the cognitive burden on physicians, and helping policymakers better prepare for future needs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Illness/therapy , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/standards , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL